adultery, bullying, cheating, Criminal Code of Canada, Cyberbullying, Defamation, divorce, Fraud, Libel, Mobbing, Stalking

Criminal Code of Canada: Defamatory Libel, Publishing, Stalking, Criminal Harassment, Cyberbullying and Identity Fraud

Section 300 of the Criminal Code of Canada is the “Punishment of Libel Known to be False”.  It states that: “Everyone who publishes a defamatory libel that he knows is false is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 5 years.”

Section 301 of the Criminal Code of Canada is the “Punishment of Defamatory Libel”.  It states that: “Everyone who publishes a defamatory libel is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years.”

The definition of “publishes” is listed in section 299 of the Criminal Code of Canada and states:

“A person publishes a libel when he exhibits it in public; causes it to be read or seen; or shows or delivers it, or causes it to be shown or delivered, with intent that it should be read or seen by the person whom it defames or by any other person.”

As a result, I will be removing any comments made by my ex and his followers that are libelous and posted on my site.

Why anyone would state such things about me and encourage others to write such accusations that include criminal acts is incomprehensible. How someone could proclaim to care for the wellness of my children while dragging their mother through the mud is, to me, the equivalent of being an abuser of my children.

Section 403 of the Criminal Code of Canada, “Identity Fraud”, states that: “Everyone commits an offence who fraudulently personates another person, living or dead, with intent to gain advantage for themselves or another person; with intent to obtain any property or an interest in any property; with intent to cause disadvantage to the person being personated or another person.”

Personating a person includes pretending to be the person or using the person’s identity information”.  Punishment for everyone who commits an offence under subsection (1) (a) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than 10 years; or (b) is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.

For stalking to be criminal harassment under section 264 of the Criminal Code of Canada, here is what my ex and his performers should be aware of:

“1.  A person does one or more of the following things:

  • repeatedly follow you, or anyone you know.
  • repeatedly communicate with you, or anyone you know, directly or indirectly.
  • repeatedly watch you, or anyone you know, or lurk around your home, workplace, or any other place you happen to be.
  • engage in any threatening conduct directed at you or a member of your family.

2. The person knows that their conduct is harassing you or they are reckless about whether their conduct is harassing you. “Reckless” means they know their conduct may harass you, but they don’t care.

A person can be stalking even if they don’t physically hurt anyone or damage any property. The law is designed to protect psychological, emotional, and physical safety.

Stalking may start with conduct that seems more annoying than dangerous. Often, the conduct is legal and even socially acceptable, if it’s just an isolated incident. But when it’s repeated, it may scare the victim.

“Cyberbullying is a type of harassment using new technology. Whether it is criminal harassment depends on the facts of a case. Cyberbullies use social media (such as Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Snapchat, and YouTube), blogs, texting, instant messaging, and other internet avenues to engage in deliberate, repeated, and hostile conduct intended to harm, embarrass, or slander someone. Although their work is public, cyberbullies are often anonymous and it is often harder to identify and stop them.

Cyberbullying may also be defamation. The Criminal Code (section 300) outlaws publishing a defamatory libel – material published, without lawful justification or excuse, likely to injure the reputation of any person by exposing them to hatred, contempt or ridicule, or designed to insult the person.”

These perpetrators think they are hiding behind user names.  What they may not realize is that every computer on a network has a unique number called an IP address. Routers also have an IP address that acts as a front man for a bunch of computers. Law enforcement can trace your IP address back to your exact physical address.

I have all of the perpetrators email addresses, IP addresses and internet service providers. For example, I can tell you that the person who posted comments under the user name Happy and Robyn Graham Cherrie (masquerading as me) is the same person, my ex. I can tell you that the people using user names Azif, Trouble Brewing, Silly Sally’s Sister, WTF and Devil’s Advocate were in the same location while they posted comments. They probably work together as the IP address is identical, indicating they all likely had separate computers running through the same router. Their service provider is Telus. WTF, Devil’s Advocate, Two Wrongs Don’t Make a Right and Winner Winner Chicken Dinner are all the same person. Time to Move on and Awesome are the same person with Rogers as their service provider. Azif and Pot Calling Kettle are the same person. Time to Move on and  NothingbutBS may be the same person or work together because although they used different email addresses they share the same IP address. I have 2 IP addresses for Sally so she may be working at 2 different places of employment or one is for her home service provider as one is Telus and the other Shaw.

I will not respond to any harassing messages and I am telling those involved in communicating with me in this manner to stop. I have been advised to provide all of your comments to the police.  I have been advised to report your conduct to your internet service providers as most companies have policies on acceptable use of their services and can cancel the service of a customer who violates those policies. If you continue to contact me I can seek a civil protection order.

Advertisements
Standard

30 thoughts on “Criminal Code of Canada: Defamatory Libel, Publishing, Stalking, Criminal Harassment, Cyberbullying and Identity Fraud

    • Sally says:

      So Laura (I can’t do it) and Togetherabandonned do you really think the police and or anyone for that matter would be interested in a blog where the blogger is the perpetrator of the crime. Let’s go back shall we.

      Togetherabandonned stated the following: “Why anyone would state such things about me and encourage others to write such accusations that include criminal acts is incomprehensible. How someone could proclaim to care for the wellness of my children while dragging their mother through the mud is, to me, the equivalent of being an abuser of my children.”

      So somehow she can defame the Slut and the Ex by showing pictures, identifying people making up complete falsehoods and not think of what that may mean to the children, the slut or the ex and yet somehow she spins that into being abuse on her?? What a joke!

      I also refer you to:

      “Cyberbullying is a type of harassment using new technology. Whether it is criminal harassment depends on the facts of a case. Cyberbullies use social media (such as Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Snapchat, and YouTube), blogs, texting, instant messaging, and other internet avenues to engage in deliberate, repeated, and hostile conduct intended to harm, embarrass, or slander someone. Although their work is public, cyberbullies are often anonymous and it is often harder to identify and stop them.

      Cyberbullying may also be defamation. The Criminal Code (section 300) outlaws publishing a defamatory libel – material published, without lawful justification or excuse, likely to injure the reputation of any person by exposing them to hatred, contempt or ridicule, or designed to insult the person.”

      So Togetherabandonned what is the purpose of this other blog than to do exactly what you’ve been doing above?

      Once again you prove what a hypocrite you are. You are the source of this and no one else. No one is attacking you. You’ve attacked the ex, the slut, the oldest daughter, the grandparents, the employer, you made comments about all these people including some that they might find interesting from a legal perspective. You’ve haven’t tried to remain hidden. You did this with purpose. And that purpose was to shame all of the above people regardless of the cost to them.

      You have grounds for nothing except indicting yourself and the idiocy that is this blog.

      Go ahead Togetherabandonned. You’ve got all the time and resources in the world. You have our information. So press the charges and let’s see who is going to end up being the one that will be charged. I actually welcome it.

      Come get me…….

  1. Sally says:

    Numerous people from day 1 of this blog have told you that publishing someone’s photo’s (that you stole from facebook), names, places of employment, etc is illegal. I encourage all followers and even our blogger to go back and read what they said, unless of course she’s now editing what is out there for her own purposes. And yet your reply is you don’t care and will do it anyway. Now you’re getting what you dished out and you can’t take it when the truth about you is becoming a reality to your followers. Now you are playing the poor me, I’m the victim. Stand up for yourself and realize that this was started by you. You can end it anytime, but yet you refuse. You were asked by the ex, his lawyer, your lawyer to remove the identifying information. You refused. They said keep the blog and say whatever you wish, just remove any identifying information. You refused. You’re not the victim. You are the abuser. Payback as you like to say is a bitch. And so is Karma.

    Live by the sword die by the sword. But don’t pretend to be a victim.

  2. Happy says:

    Good morning Bonbon! I guess your detective work doesn’t confirm your suspicions that all the posters are the same person…thats gotta hurt knowing most of the posters are your friends and family. I was going to suggest that you begin a new career in IT since you are so good at identifying IP addresses, but that will probably have to be put on hold while you are serving your time in jail for your disability fraud.

  3. Sally says:

    Bad boys, whatcha want
    Watcha want, whatcha gonna do?
    When sheriff John Brown come for you
    Tell me whatcha wanna do, whatcha gonna do?

    Bad boys, bad boys whatcha gonna do?
    Whatcha gonna do when they come for you?
    Bad boys, bad boys whatcha gonna do?
    Whatcha gonna do when they come for you?

    When you were eight and you had bad traits
    You go to school and learn the golden rule
    So why are you acting like a bloody fool?
    If you get hot, you must get cool

    Bad boys, bad boys whatcha gonna do?
    Whatcha gonna do when they come for you?
    Bad boys, bad boys whatcha gonna do?
    Whatcha gonna do when they come for you?

    You chuck it on that one
    You chuck it on this one
    You chuck it on your mother
    And you chuck it on your father

    You chuck it on your brother
    And you chuck it on your sister
    You chuck it on that one
    And you chuck it on me

    Bad boys, bad boys whatcha gonna do?
    Whatcha gonna do when they come for you?
    Bad boys, bad boys whatcha gonna do?
    Whatcha gonna do when they come for you?

  4. Sally says:

    I’m feeling lonely and abandoned by Togetherabandonned. I put on my makeup and best dress. I cleaned the house and baked cookies. And here I sit all alone waiting for the po po to show and it’s a no go.

    So to cool my heels while I wait, an old Bobby Vinton classic for us to sing along too.

    Lonely, I’m Ms. Lonely
    I have nobody for my own
    I am so lonely, I’m Ms. Lonely
    Wish I had someone to call on the phone

    Now I’m a soldier, a lonely soldier
    Away from home through no wish of my own
    That’s why I’m lonely, I’m Ms. Lonely
    I wish that I could go back home

    Letters, never a letter
    I get no letters in the mail
    I’ve been forgotten, yes, forgotten
    Oh how I wonder, how is it I failed

    Now I’m a soldier, a lonely soldier
    Away from home through no wish of my own
    That’s why I’m lonely, I’m Ms. Lonely
    I wish that I could go back home

  5. I’m sorry to burst the bubble of your abusers but I actually just used this law against someone who abused me. You are all liable to criminal charges. Your continued bullying is just making a stronger case against all of you. The person you are targetting does not have to prove anything and counter accusations don’t carry any weight.

      • There is a big difference between what she has done and the continual harassment that you practising. If you really think that you have a legal case you should take appropriate action. I think you enjoy doing this otherwise you would have taken the legal route. I am neither judging or taking sides but you are bullying that is fact. I would also point out that you come across as a little unstable and sinister especially your use of the name ‘Bonbon’. I really think you need to take a step back for your own sake. Is what you get from doing this worth getting a criminal record for? I daresay you will have another attempt at a smart reply but you should know that I am not interested in further debate and I have no desire to feed your desire for revenge. I will not be adding any more comments.

    • Happy says:

      “Whore”, you probably are not aware but the blogger has a history if stalking others that has already been reported to the police..entering homes, vehicles, workplaces, contacting friends and employers, sending harassing messages, texts, blogging, vandalism, theft, dishonesty, fraud, lying….need I go on?

      • Then take the legal route. Please don’t ever again use my blog name in that context. I am not and never have been such a person. I have no such history. I did not show you any disrepect whatsoever. Your misuse of my name certainly shows you in a bad light for sure.

    • Sally says:

      Whoresnotwelcome, thank you for your advice. First off you should consider changing your name. It’s really not very inclusive in the world we live in today. Why discriminate against whores? It’s not very Christian like and I believe we should all try to get along and love one another.

      Now onto your comments. Maybe in your world that was true. But before you spout off, make sure you know the facts. That’s the problem with you people on these blogs. You try to sound like you know everything and then give idiotic advice. Go ahead and read the blog….in it’s entirety. From the beginning. Then take a big dose, not a grain, but a big dose of salt, and wonder if any of this is even true, or it’s someone who clearly has an axe to grind. If you don’t think that the tone is abusive or harassing in nature then I think you are sadly misguided.

      You say you’re not judging or taking sides. Well if that is the case, keep your opinions to yourself and just sit back and watch the frivolity.

      • I have read the blog. Maybe you should read mine before you ‘spout off’. The whore my blog refers to stalked me, threatened me, tried to take my disabled son, reported me as a domestic abuser when my husband ended their affair. Then finally threatened to kill me. For the record I never once confronted her. The police traced her IP address and I was just one of many victims. I commented on your actions because I really think that if you think you have a case you should persue it. This really isn’t the place to do it. As far as being Christian if I wasn’t I would have done the same as you are doing. I never defended myself. ‘You people on these blogs’. All we know is the pain of infidelity. If my advice is idiotic then just ignore instead of attacking me. I don’t see any frivolity in any of this. I am sorry that you find it so funny. There are no winners in these situations. Please now just leave me alone I have been put through enough.

      • Happy says:

        “Whoresnotwelcome”. Your user name is very disrespectful and judgmental and deserves to be ridiculed. I am sorry for any difficulties you have had in your life, I have no idea what your truths are, just as you have no idea what robyn’s are just from reading this blog. The fact that you can take a side when you do not know the truth says something about you, no?

      • Sally says:

        Thanks but I’m not interested in commiserating with the other cheerleaders of hate. Clearly, your situation is completely different and has no similarity whatsoever. So I stick by my original comments that the advice was idiotic in nature. Your blog or life circumstance has nothing to do with this blog or the allegations that have been posted. Take your own advice, ignore the comments if you don’t like them. If you can’t stand the heat then get off the blog and keep your nose out of others business.

      • Sally says:

        And by the way whoresnotwelcome, wtf does reading your blog have anything to do with this. This site is not about you and your life. It’s togetherabandonned and her shitty life. Jesus are you all so self centered and wrapped up in yourselves and your blogs that you can’t see there are other people but you and your tales of woe. Get out once in a while.

  6. Happy says:

    Sally please be patient. Bonbon has a full day of sleeping, yoga and starbucks (we know there’s no cleaning involved). She can’t be expected to entertain you continuously all day. The popo have serious things to do..like investigate disability insurance fraud.

    • Happy says:

      “Whoresnotwelcome”. Your user name is very disrespectful and judgmental and deserves to be ridiculed for those reasons alone. I am sorry for any difficulties you have had in your life, I have no idea what your truths are, just as you have no idea what robyn’s are just from reading this blog. The fact that you can take a side when you do not know the truth says something about you, no?

      • I’ve tried to take the high road, your issue with Robyn is one thing. But never did the blogger above insult you in no way. I assume, Happy that you are Janice and I do feel bad that your identity was outed on this site instead of the husbands. I feel bad that you slept with a married man, and for the life of me I don’t get why people cheat. I will however say I’d never mind the woman who found it ok to include me in a threesome unknowingly to me no matter the horrible disgusting witch my husband says I am to appease his guilty conscience. My problem would be my husband and happily I’d give him his freedom and give you my sloppy seconds and I’d hope that it really was worth destroying a family (yours and his).

        And, Sally, you are probably the best friend. I’ve had friends like you and I’ve been that friend too, who’d go to war even knowing it wasn’t the right thing or way. Be carful who you put your hands in the fire for. Not everyone is worth it or would return the favor.

        I’m just going to say, I think mean girls is a high school thing, not something a professional woman of a certain age should be partaking in. Let the king of this handle it. If he is such an upstanding and honourable man, and I hope he has manners and class to go the right rout in order to come to an understanding with the owner of this blog.

        But a little advice to his gf, if he treats the mother of his children poorly (not that I know this is true) don’t be shocked if things become sour with you and you receive the same courtesy.

        I truly hope for all parties involved in this matter that you find a civil way to resolve this.

  7. Happy says:

    Kcrambles..you are correct about one thing, and that is that you have no idea what is true. You have read this blog and accepted it as fact..and that is the problem, it is not. The blogger and others seem to think they can be disrespectful to posters and not receive the same back? Many of the posters here are friends and family of the blogger and she knows it.

  8. Happy says:

    This blog is indeed a “mean girl” thing..that is a good observation. It is harassing. Defamatory. Remember also that the blogger is a vandal. Finally some people are standing up to it. You should be applauding the people who are saying to the “mean girl” that enough is enough.

  9. Sally says:

    KCRAMBLES, I think you are dismissing the actions of the blogger. That it’s OK, justified and understandable the things that have been posted? Is it really ok to out people, or shame them or whatever it is that the blogging world thinks is ok to do to people? There are children involved and this type of writing is not beneficial to them. I’m not saying it’s not ok to have a blog to express your feelings or try to provide a road map for others to follow in similar circumstances, but putting people’s photo’s, names, places of employment etc is not acceptable. That is an open attack, harassment, bullying etc of the person you’re doing that too. So if you choose to do that as the blogger on the internet, then you expose yourself to the response that she has received.

    This site has been running for more than two years. No one has commented on this site until recently, and that is because the blogger has continued the harassment and bullying. Enough is enough.

    Followers have commented that she shouldn’t have posted that kind of information because it constitutes harassment and bullying. She refused to heed the comments of those people. Her close friends have talked with her and asked her to remove that and even to stop the blog because it was not healthy for her. They’ve pointed out that it would be damaging for the kids to see it and again she refuses. She’s been asked by the ex for a year to simply remove the identify information and continue saying whatever she wishes in the interests of the children and she refuses.

    So why do you think that behavior is acceptable or to be condoned? She refuses to take into account the damage this is doing to the kids. She’s so consumed with this that she continues it despite the horrible things that are being written. Why? To prove herself right? The other people are terrible people? What does that do for anyone?

    The blogger has suggested that her children are the most important thing to her. If that is true, why would she expose them to this? There’s a very simple answer to this and that is remove the identifying information. That’s all anyone has asked. It’s in the best interests of the children and she can continue to write her insane postings and everyone goes on their way.

    Pretty simple solution don’t you think KCRAMBLES?

    So I think your questions really should be posed to the blogger, why won’t you do this? Why would you expose your children to this hate when you have the control to fix it?

  10. Two Wrongs Don't Make a Right says:

    Things seem to get all muddled up in the heat of posting.
    Happy and Sally, it’s obvious you have a personal interest in this blog, and the blogger. It’s clear your angry, and it’s clear you aren’t going anywhere. I see a lot of baiting on the blogger’s part, but she’s been pretty quiet since this very informative post regarding certain sections of the criminal code.
    Maybe everyone is reflecting, I don’t know.
    Happy and Sally,
    What would it take for you to stop? Have you asked the blogger, here, for what you want?
    Can we dumb down the request and in point form ask for what you want in order for both of you and the blogger to be on their merry ways?
    Right now, everyone is just ‘chucking shit’ and it’s confusing.
    Let’s be clear about the demands of the other without the novels and stories about all the injustices done to one another.
    Point form.
    Blogger and posters just ask for what you want; sans drama.
    Make this nonsense stop.

  11. Sally says:

    Two Wrongs…..it’s in the last post. Remove the photos, names, employers etc. Anything that is identifying. That’s all that has ever been asked.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s